Tuesday, April 23, 2013

The failure of Black Economic Empowerment

BEE Cartoon by Zapiro

Supporters of Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) argue that BEE promotes economic development, reduced inequality, social upliftment and other good causes. Actually, over the last decade, since the adoption of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Bill in 2003, the true main goal of BEE was the redistribution of capital according to artificial, political aims, at the expense of consumers.

For confirmation that BEE is an attempt to enforce a political blueprint on society, there is no need to look further than the following statement by Trade and Industry minister, Rob Davies: “Black economic empowerment is not just a social and political imperative. We need to make sure that in the country's economy, control, ownership and leadership are reflective of the demographics of the society in the same way the political space does. That's why we are saying Black Economic Empowerment remains an economic imperative.”

The act is currently under review, but unfortunately only with a view on giving it teeth. In terms of the bill of November 2012
  • A BEE commission will be created to boost BEE compliance;
  • Companies on the Johannesburg stock exchange will be obligated to report their BEE status and any information the BEE commission may require; and
  • Heavy penalties, including jail time and fines of up to 10% of company turnover, can be imposed if it is found that false BEE information was supplied.

As political blueprint BEE has had consequences quite contrary to the empowerment of black people, economic development and reduced inequality. In fact, it slowed the pace of economic growth as well as the evenness – also in terms of race categories – with which economic wealth spread in society.

Someone who is in favour of achieving the positive aims given in justification of BEE, like economic growth, reduced inequality and increased economic participation by more black people, should oppose the policy of BEE. Measured against these desirable outcomes, the current policy of BEE is counterproductive. If kept in mind that the main goals of BEE is the transfer of capital according to political processes, then five steps show why BEE is harmful.


“Wealth in itself is nothing but the food, conveniences and pleasures of life,” Richard Cantillon wrote in opening sentence of his 1730 Essay on Economic Theory, the first economic treatise. Cantillon's insight of almost 300 years ago is as valid today: if one seeks to know if BEE supports wealth creation, then one should consider if consumers in general have greater access to “the food, conveniences and pleasures of life” than before.


Goods and services – the conveniences of life – do not fall from the air, but are the end products of complex chains of production. These chains of production – including machines, labour processes, tools, supplies, etcetera – forms the economy's capital structure. The better the economy's capital structure is put together and maintained, the more and better is the goods and services it renders and the greater everyone's wealth.


The updating of the capital structure is the task of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs are motivated by the profit motive to make sensible judgments about people's future needs. In order to provide for people's future needs, entrepreneurs have to adjust the capital structure in advance, so that the capital structure may produce the appropriate products at an appropriate time. The better entrepreneurs perform this task, the better the capital structure will be adjusted to deliver the most wealth for everyone.


In a free market environment the best entrepreneurs are identified in a consumer-led process. In this process, each consumer (in BEE terms: black, coloured, Indian and white people) play a role, each time when a consumer buys one item and leaves another on the shelf. In this process that entrepreneur who satisfy consumer needs best are rewarded, while his competitors are not rewarded. Investors (capitalists) direct their investments to consumers' favourite entrepreneurs – those who make the most profit.

Therefore, the best entrepreneurs (those who adjust the capital structure in a way that serves consumers best) have greater access to capital.


BEE undermines consumers' choice of entrepreneurs. Instead of entrepreneurs being evaluated daily by consumers according to the wealth they produce, BEE evaluates entrepreneurs according to political measures. Investors are therefore no longer free to direct money to those entrepreneurs who are best able to manage the capital structure and create the most wealth. More capital now land in the hands of politically favoured entrepreneurs, who create less wealth.

What BEE therefore does, is to redistribute the capital structure, through a process of political favouring, from better to worse entrepreneurs. Afterwards, there is less wealth in the economy and the remaining assets are concentrated in the hands of an elite with the right political friends.

Consumers, for whom all goods and services in the end exist, are harmed by this. BEE cannot speed up economic growth, the reduction of inequality or general black empowerment. According to the true measure of wealth – access to goods and services – almost all South Africans, including black people, are poorer thanks to BEE. The only winners in this process is the politically favoured black elite and other people (including white, coloured and Indian people) who manage to exploit this artificial system.

Sourced from: Solidarity Research Institute's Labour Market Report - April 2013 (PDF)

The Solidarity Labour Market Report is a quarterly publication by the Solidarity Research Institute for the trade union Solidarity. The report is compiled by Paul Joubert and Piet le Roux, senior researchers at the Solidarity Research Institute.


Gossip Girl said... .....Click here to refresh this blog

What the masses have failed to understand in addition to what you wrote is the fact that BEE is one of the most racist policies on the planet - and I don't mean against whites. I am talking about the fact that BEE presupposes that blacks are unable to become economically active on their own and that they need a leg up.

This had fed the entitlement mindset for years now and has basically bred an entire generation of illiterate "gimmes".

Tia Mysoa said... .....Click here to refresh this blog

Speaking of racism…

Children are victims of BBBEE Act - Children's home not Black enough!

The Jakaranda and Louis Botha Children’s Homes confirms the statement in the Times Newspaper (23 April 2013) stating that our Corporate funding has decreased by 70% over the last 3 years due to the BBBEE regulations that states that Corporate Companies will receive BBBEE points when they allocate their CSI budget towards a 75% BBBEE Charity Organisation.

Click here to view the The Times article.

Gossip Girl said... .....Click here to refresh this blog

@Tia Mysoa

I saw that too. But wait, it gets worse. The new codes are on their way and with the changes to those codes the worst should be expected for all of us.

They terrify me and most of my clients too. Going to see some very interesting accounting and number games when this comes out.

Latest 5 Featured Posts:

Operation Vula, its Secret Safari, and Zuma’s band of comrades - Dec. 2013
During 1986 the ANC launched an underground operation called Operation Vula. A lesser-known fact is that it continued to operate after Nelson Mandela's release in February 1990, and for three years after his speech in August 1990 when he reiterated the total commitment of the ANC, Umkhonto we Sizwe and the SACP to the Groote Schuur Minute.

Heritage Day Photographs (Voortrekker Monument) - Sept. 2013
This posting includes a few photographs taken on Heritage Day 2013. The posting introduces an unusual but beautiful new structure called QUO VADIS? (with the question mark) which I’m sure many readers have never heard of.

The Yellow-Bucket Marula Tree: A Mystery Solved! - Oct. 2013
I came across a rather strange phenomenon one day while travelling along the R561 route between Tolwe and Baltimore in the Limpopo province of South Africa. A small yellow bucket was attached high-up in a branch of a Marula tree, hence the name of this posting. It’s a real funny story which I’m sure most readers will enjoy - as much as I enjoyed compiling the article  - (with illustrations).

Pretoria’s Monument for Victims of Terrorism - July 2013
Many people (including myself) had almost forgotten about a noteworthy monument in Pretoria that stood at the entrance of the old Munitoria building on the corner of Van der Walt and Vermeulen Streets (now renamed Lilian Ngoyi and Madiba Streets). When the Munitoria building was demolished on 7 July 2013 nobody could tell me whether the monument was still standing or not, so I decided to go look for myself.

Remembering The Battle of Delville Wood - July 2013
14 July marks a day when the South African 1st Infantry Brigade got engaged in the 1916 (WW1) Battle of the Somme, in France. The battle was one of the largest of World War I, in which more than a million men were wounded or killed, making it one of humanity's bloodiest battles. One specific encounter during this battle, known as The Battle of Delville Wood, is of particular importance to South Africa. The posting includes a comprehensive article (with pictures) compiled and written by Petros Kondos.

African Countries (Alphabetical list):
(The links will redirect to the Amazon.com page dealing with the specific country.)