If one has to summarize the main difference between the instinct of an animal and that of man, then I believe it’s safe to declare that animals have a survival instinct, while man (in addition to a survival instinct) also has an instinct to achieve success.
One can draw many conclusions from this basic fact, particularly when it is becoming increasingly apparent here in South Africa that many people from all races, but mainly Blacks, prefer to behave exactly like animals, -- not like lovable, cuddly, cute little animals, but in most cases like ‘inhuman’ savage and lustful beasts. If you want solid evidence for this then send me an email, and I’ll provide you with plenty! For starters you may wish to view the following links, but be warned as some facts and graphics may disturb sensitive viewers:
- Thugs savagely mutilate cows
- 'How my five-month-old baby was raped'
- Mutilated rhino corpses found in Kruger
- The Farm Murder Plague
- Over 2000 Black kids thrown away yearly
What inspired me to write this post was a 50-page thesis with the title: Race, Evolution, and Behavior - A Life History Perspective (2nd Special Abridged Edition) by Professor J. Philippe Rushton -- (Also available free online – see the link at the end of this posting).
The research documented in this work is an attempt to understand differences between the three main races (Orientals, Caucasians, and Blacks) in terms of life-history evolution. In other words, that separate races of human beings evolved different strategies to cope with different environments and that these strategies lead to various physical differences.
One example mentioned in the thesis is that people who evolved in the warm but highly unpredictable environment of Africa adopted a strategy of high reproduction, while people who migrated to the hostile cold of Europe and northern Asia took to producing fewer children but nurturing them more carefully. This explains why Africa's population growth is the highest in the world, and also why the Blackman is more prone to sexually-related crimes and sexually-related diseases.
Very few people today are concerned with understanding the problems associated with race, in fact the ‘broad-minded’ consensus is that we are ALL EQUAL, irrespective of skin colour. Professor Rushton’s assumptions, based on extensive scientific research, does not suggest that the overall characteristics of one specific race is superior to another race, but it does reveal that life-history evolution is still in progress, and that there are major differences between the races. Why are we then ignoring this conclusive evidence, and why are we not using the data for the benefit of all mankind?
Why does our history show Africa always trailing behind Asia and Europe when it comes to economic and political development, safety and security, health issues, etc..? Why does a high quality ‘western’ lifestyle not appeal to the majority of Blacks, even if they are given ample opportunities, productive land, and vast sums of money to achieve this? Do the same hormones that give Blacks an edge at sports, also makes them restless in school and prone to crime? These are only a few of the 100-and-10 questions directly related to genetic racial differences, but yet there is not one single module established in our democratic system of government that officially acknowledges these differences. The modules that exist vaguely recognizes cultural differences only, but there’s a big difference between culture and race!
The following extract was taken from Professor Rushton’s Race, Evolution, and Behavior - A Life History Perspective. My only reason for publishing this extract is to give readers some perspective on this issue. I also believe that the best way to do this is to go back in history.
Race in History
Even before there were any intelligence tests, philosophers, statesmen, merchants, and others thought there was a link between race, intelligence, and cultural achievement. Aristotle, Plato, Voltaire, and David Hume all believed this. So did Broca, Darwin, Galton, and all the founders of evolution and anthropology. Even Freud believed in some race differences. But this began to change in the 1920s with Franz Boas and James B. Watson, who believed that culture could change just about anything.
Today, writers like Jared Diamond in Guns, Germs and Steel (1997) and S. J. Gould in The Mismeasure of Man (1996) tell us there is no link between race, intelligence, and culture. The differences we see are all just because of bad luck or White racism.
The first explorers in East Africa wrote that they were shocked by the nudity, paganism, cannibalism, and poverty of the natives. Some claimed Blacks had the nature "of wild animals... most of them go naked... the child does not know his father, and they eat people." Another claimed they had a natural sense of rhythm so that if a Black "were to fall from heaven to earth he would beat time as he goes down." A few even wrote books and made paintings of Africans with over-sized sex organs. Sound familiar? All just a reflection of racism? Maybe so, but these examples are not from 19th Century European colonialists or KKK hate literature. They come from the Muslim Arabs who first entered Black Africa over 1,200 years ago (in the 700s), as detailed in Bernard Lewis’s 1990 book, Race and Slavery in the Middle East.
Several hundred years later, European explorers had the same impressions. They wrote that Africans seemed to have a very low intelligence and few words to express complex thoughts. They praised some tribes for making fine pottery, forging iron, carving wooden art, and making musical instruments. But more often, they were shocked by the near nakedness of the people, their poor sanitary habits, simple houses, and small villages. They found no wheels for making pots, grinding corn, or for transport, no farm animals, no writing, no money, and no numbering systems.
The Whites who explored China were just as racist as those who explored Africa, but their descriptions were different from what they and the Arabs had written about Africans. In 1275 Marco Polo arrived in China from his native Italy to open trade with the Mongol Empire. He found that the Chinese had well built roads, bridges, cities connected by canals, census takers, markets, standardized weights and measures, and not only coins, but paper money as well. Even a postal system was in existence.
All of these made him marvel when he compared the Chinese to what he saw in Europe and the Middle East. Even though he was an Italian, proud of his people and well aware of the greatness of Ancient Rome, Marco Polo wrote: "Surely there is no more intelligent race on earth than the Chinese."
Historical research bears out Marco Polo’s impressions. As early as 360 B.C., the Chinese used the cross bow and changed the face of warfare. Around 200-100 B.C., the Chinese used written exams to choose people for the civil service, two thousand years before Britain. The Chinese used printing about 800 A.D., some 600 years before Europe saw Gutenberg’s first Bible. Paper money was used in China in 1300, but not in Europe until the 19th and 20th centuries. By 1050 Chinese chemists had made gunpowder, hand grenades, fire arrows, and rockets of oil and poison gas. By 1100, factories in China with 40,000 workers were making rockets. Flame throwers, guns, and cannons were used in China by the 13th century, about 100 years before Europe.
The Chinese used the magnetic compass as early as the 1st century. It is not found in European records until 1190. In 1422, seventy years before Columbus’s three small ships crossed the Atlantic, the Chinese reached the east coast of Africa. They came in a great fleet of 65 ocean going ships filled with 27,000 soldiers and their horses, and a year’s supply of grain, meat, and wine. With their gunpowder weapons, navigation, accurate maps and magnetic compasses, the Chinese could easily have gone around the tip of Africa and “discovered” Europe!
In the last five centuries, the European nations leapfrogged over the Chinese in science and technology. Since 1950, however, Japan has beaten the West in the production of many high-tech products. Other Pacific Rim countries (China, Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea) now follow Japan’s path. Africa, on the other hand, has fallen further behind. The poor conditions of African countries and Black America have become a concern to many. Much of the optimism of the U.S. Civil Rights movement of the 1960s is gone, along with the high hopes for independent African nations. Trillions of dollars of foreign aid have poured into Africa. Yet African economies have declined since the Europeans left.
Neglect and decay are seen everywhere in Africa and much of the West Indies. International corporations often have to provide their own power, their own water, and their own phones. In the age of computers, fax machines, and the world wide web, getting a dial tone in many African cities is difficult.
Race, Evolution, and Behavior - A Life History Perspective (2nd Special Abridged Edition) by Professor J. Philippe Rushton
High IQ = High Success
If one looks at the chart on the right, which illustrates the average IQ scores for the various races, there is a conspicuous difference between US Blacks and Africans.
This data then suggests that the intelligence and success of US Blacks could only have progressed with some assistance and influence from another race with a higher-IQ, -- which explains why there are many Blacks born, bred, and educated in the USA, that have the exact same qualities, ethics and values than the average ‘cultured’ Whiteman.
The only problem I have with the average American, is that they have this bizarre notion in their minds that similar results can be achieved in Africa, without the constructive influence of the Asian or the Whiteman.
Blacks and White liberals who argue that IQ tests are unfair, discriminatory, racist bla, bla, bla, should first examine exactly how these tests were performed and by whom before they start pointing fingers. These IQ tests were based on “culture-free” as well as standard IQ tests. Blacks in fact, scored slightly higher on standard IQ tests than they did on the “culture-free” tests, which is the opposite of what so-called ‘culture theory’ predicts.
This brings us to the next round of prickly questions, and the first topic that comes to mind is the subject of race-mixing (also known as miscegenation). One is inclined to assume that the clever people in the top structures (U kNow whO) must surely have incorporated the research of academics such as Professor Rushton (and others like him) into their many schemes, for it is rather obvious where the worldwide trend is going with this issue.
You don’t have to be a genetic-expert to figure out that race-mixing with the Black races (on a large scale) will drastically lower the intelligence levels of human beings in general. However, one must not overlook another undeniable fact of life, and that is: While the worlds population is being pressurized to mix with other races, there will always be a undisclosed cluster of elite humans (with a higher intelligence than average) who will never risk the chances of evolving backwards. If the current trend continues, the end result will thus produce a graph as depicted on the right. Now there’s some food for thought!
Other prickly questions that come to mind are related to quality and quantity, for we all know that in the long term it is QUALITY that really matters, but then again it is the QUANTITY that brings in the votes, -- another reason why a population with low IQ’s work favourably towards keeping a cunning, corrupt, money-hungry government in power.
Undoubtedly, the same principle also benefits the consumer market. The higher the number of unintelligent lazy people there are, who don’t know how to grow their own food, make their own clothes, or fix broken appliances, the higher the profits for retailers! (See the latest business report: Africa set to be major global player)
The 2nd Special Abridged Edition of Professor J. Philippe Rushton’s research results is available online in pdf format. Click here to download (1,245 KB).
- Has Cain’s way become the norm?
- Evidence of early Chinese influence in Africa
- Exposing the synagogue of satan (Part 1)
On the sister blog, tia4christ.blogspot.com...